New BIS Rules Ease Export Controls for Australian Space Sector
- ECAG
- Oct 21, 2024
- 3 min read

The U.S. Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) has recently announced two new rules that significantly modify export controls under the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) for the export of specific space-related items to Australia. These rules, effective immediately, aim to strengthen collaboration with the United States’ key allies, including Australia, by streamlining export licensing requirements for space technologies.
Key Updates for Australian Exporters:
1. Relaxation of License Requirements for Spacecraft and Components:
The BIS has removed the license requirements for certain items classified under ECCNs 9A515 and 9E515 when exported to Australia. This rule specifically targets components and technologies related to remote sensing, space-based logistics, spacecraft assembly, and servicing activities. By removing these controls, the BIS hopes to foster greater cooperation with Australia, supporting both countries’ space industries while balancing national security concerns.
2. Expansion of License Exceptions:
In a separate interim final rule, the BIS has expanded license exceptions and simplified the licensing requirements for less sensitive spacecraft components. This rule benefits over 40 allied countries and partners, including Australia, as it allows easier access to certain U.S.-origin spacecraft parts and components.
3. Implications for Australia’s Space Sector:
For Australian space companies, this regulatory shift presents a significant opportunity. By easing export controls, Australian firms engaged in space logistics, satellite manufacturing, and remote sensing technology development can access cutting-edge U.S. technologies with fewer bureaucratic hurdles. This is expected to drive innovation and increase Australia’s capacity to collaborate in joint space missions and other cooperative initiatives, including those involving NASA.
Enhancing the Competitive Edge of Australia’s Space Industry
The removal of these licensing requirements comes as part of a broader initiative by the BIS to support the competitiveness of the U.S. space industry while ensuring exports align with national security and foreign policy interests. By reducing red tape for allied nations such as Australia, the BIS aims to boost collaborative ventures and joint missions, reinforcing alliances while advancing technological progress.
What Australian Exporters Need to Know:
• Affected Export Control Classification Numbers (ECCNs): The BIS changes specifically affect ECCNs 9A515 and 9E515. These ECCNs encompass a range of spacecraft systems, including technology used in the assembly, servicing, and logistics of space missions, as well as remote sensing technology.
• Implications for Licensing: Australian exporters dealing with these specific ECCNs will benefit from reduced licensing requirements, enabling them to accelerate timelines for space projects and potentially lower costs associated with export compliance.
• Cooperative Initiatives: The BIS’s streamlined regulations aim to enhance international cooperation, particularly with Australian entities engaged in joint ventures or projects with U.S. partners like NASA. This regulatory alignment underscores the strategic importance of Australia as a key ally in the global space domain.
Conclusion
The BIS’s decision to remove licensing requirements for select space-related exports to Australia is a positive development for the Australian space industry. It opens doors for deeper cooperation and technological exchange, enabling Australian companies to leverage U.S. expertise and resources more effectively. As Australia continues to expand its space sector capabilities, these regulatory updates are a welcome step toward fostering a more integrated and innovative international space community.
For further details, exporters are advised to review the full text of the BIS rules or consult with export control professionals to understand how these changes may impact their specific business activities.
Comments